Testing, assessment, and feedback constitute important areas of consideration for language teachers as they decide not only how to evaluate student performance and proficiency but also whether / how evaluations represent a teaching tool in their own right that students use, for example, as a source of additional input and interaction. Indeed, research in pedagogy and second language acquisition now suggest that traditional “summative” tests (such as final exams that aim to test students’ knowledge of discrete grammar points, vocabulary, etc.) both do not motivate students to learn and do not reinforce learning (Shrum and Glisan 292). This is especially true when the activities on these types of “summative” tests do not reflect the types of activities and skills performed and valued in class. Thus, it is important for language instructors to think through their approach to testing in order to ensure that instruction and assessment are closely aligned. As Florencia Henshaw and Maris Hawkins emphasize in Common Ground: Second Language Acquisition Theory Goes to the Classroom, “The tasks students are asked to perform as part of any assessment should mirror what students have been doing in class, and at the same time, in-class activities should be informed by assessment results” (37). The sub-pages of this section of the LibGuide will focus on research into various aspects of assessment, such as types of testing, rubrics, and feedback. The last sub-page will address research regarding the growing movement of “ungrading.”
*These four principles are cited from: Shrum, Judith, and Eileen Glisan. Teacher’s Handbook: Contextualized Language Instruction, 2000, p. 229.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Generic License.