It is important to have considered a research question prior to digitizing materials in the Scan Tech Studio, as well as a plan on how you will use your materials to answer this question. If you do not, you may find later that you scanned the wrong materials, or not enough of them. It could be that you needed a better or different file type for your workflow.
To avoid redundant visits, we suggest that you consider the following when evaluating your research question:
Identify a general interesting topic that you would like to research. Carefully examine the existing literature on your topic of interest to learn more about what others have already done or are doing. A research question should be clear, focused, complex, and arguable:
Is your research question clear?
It should provide enough specifics that your audience can easily understand its purpose without needing additional explanation.
Is your research question focused?
It should be narrow enough that it can be answered thoroughly in the space that the assignment allows.
Is your research question complex?
It should not be answerable with a simple “yes” or “no,” but rather requires synthesis and analysis of ideas and sources prior to producing any answer.
Is your research question arguable?
Its potential answers should be open to debate rather than exist as accepted facts.
Adapted from: “How to Write a Research Question.” n.d. The Writing Center. https://writingcenter.gmu.edu/writing-resources/research-based-writing/how-to-write-a-research-question.
This section briefly addresses some of the legal considerations for digitizing objects. For a more in-depth look at copyright in libraries and research in general, visit our Copyright Crash Course Library Guide.
Before digitizing your materials, you will want to consider the end-use case and the legality of creating a digital copy. As of 1 January 2024, books published in the US before 1929 and sound recordings published before 1924 are considered to be public domain. If your material still retains copyright status, or its copyright status is unknown, you may still be able to create a digital reproduction of the material under the Fair Use Doctrine. In short, this doctrine allows the use and reproduction of some copyrighted material under specific circumstances on a case-by-case basis, such as for academic research and educational purposes. Cornell University Library has a good checklist that can help determine fair use status when using copyrighted materials.
When seeking to digitize materials owned by a library, archive, or other institution, there may be other restrictions that apply. If in doubt, refer back to the owning institution’s policies and contact their staff for specific questions.
For further general information about fair use and copyright in libraries and archives, see the American Library Association’s resource guide and this easy to follow chart on what is considered public domain in the United States from Cornell University Library.
WATCH is a joint program between the Harry Ransom Center and The University of Reading Library in England. Here you can search an author’s name to find the copyright holders of their works.
For professional legal advice, contact an intellectual property attorney.
When scanning material:
It is important to think about a long-term plan from the earliest outset of your project so that you can set aside enough time and resources to ensure that your data will be accessible long after your project is over. Publishing to a digital repository can keep data preserved and accessible:
If increased access and preservation are of interest to you, please read more on our Archiving and Sharing Your Work library guide.
When looking to store your work in a repository, consider using one provided by UT. Some benefits of using a UT repository for your work are:
Discipline Specific Repositories:
Open Access Directory - A list of data repositories worldwide.
Please contact us for assistance with your project using this form.
Humanities Data Curation Checklist
Created by Adriana Cásarez, Spring 2020. A checklist guide for humanities researchers and liaison librarians on key considerations for making their data findable, accessible and clear to interested scholars and institutions.
Data Curation in the Texas Data Repository
Created by Brenna Wheeler, Spring 2020 Capstone. A data curation workflow to improve the findability and reusability of datasets, localized to the Texas Data Repository.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Generic License.