Primary sources are produced by participants or direct observers of an event or time period. These sources may be recorded during the event or later on, by a participant reflecting upon the event.
Why would I use them?
Primary sources offer a first-hand or eyewitness account of a situation that is unfiltered by interpretation.
What are some examples?
How should I use them in my research?
Primary sources are fertile places for original thinking and inquiry. Allow the questions you have about the sources guide you.
To analyze primary sources, ask yourself these questions:
Where can I find primary sources?
In the Library catalog, use keywords that will limit to your desired format, such as ‘diary’, ‘letters’, ‘speeches’.
You can also limit the databases to a type of resource (newspapers, primary sources) here: https://guides.lib.utexas.edu/az.php
Secondary sources are interpretations and evaluations of primary sources. They are analyses of primary sources written by scholars and experts in a field after the time period or event has occurred.
Why would I use them?
Secondary sources have the benefit of hindsight. The author is able to contextualize the primary source in a way that takes into account other viewpoints and events that happened at the same time or afterwards.
Where are some examples?
How should I use them in my research?
Secondary sources are useful when you need an expert’s or a scholar’s interpretation of a topic. This individual has spent her career researching primary documents and interpreting, analyzing and contextualizing them.
When searching for secondary sources, find a variety of perspectives. You can do this by analyzing the evidence an author uses and finding points where she disagrees with or builds off of previous scholars.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Generic License.

