A Scoping Review is one of many evidence synthesis methodologies. Similar to a Systematic Review, a Scoping Review requires a systematic search strategy and clear, structured reporting. Unlike a Systematic Review, a Scoping Review is exploratory in nature and answers a broad research question designed to assess the extent of the existing research.
According to Arksey & O'Malley, who wrote the seminal work on Scoping Reviews, this particular methodology serve 4 primary purposes:
Note
The key to a publishable review is good planning and organization from the very beginning. It is helpful to meet with a librarian before you begin your review to learn more about the resources and strategies available help you get and stay organized through the process.
It's also important to note the limitations inherent in scoping review methodology in your published papers.
Lynn Bostwick: Nursing, Nutrition, Pharmacy, Public Health
Meryl Brodsky: Communication and Information Studies
Hannah Chapman Tripp: Biology, Neuroscience
Carolyn Cunningham: Human Development & Family Sciences, Psychology, Sociology
Larayne Dallas: Engineering
Liz DeHart: Marine Science
Grant Hardaway: Educational Psychology, Kinesiology & Health Education, Social Work
Janelle Hedstrom: Special Education, Curriculum & Instruction, Ed Leadership & Policy
Susan Macicak: Linguistics
Imelda Vetter: Dell Medical School
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License.